wouldn’t comment on their cut of the mammoth award, even a 20 percent fee would
net the lawyers more than $100 million—
but the carnage was unsettling. Given BDO’s
gross U.S. revenue of $589 million last year,
the gargantuan verdict could threaten the
accounting firm’s survival.
Two months after the verdict, Thomas and
Sullivan & Cromwell parted ways. In a year
when there was no shortage of partners with
eight-figure books of business changing firms,
Thomas was certainly one of the few to leave
with a potential nine-figure fee attached to
his resume. His departure was, of course,
handled decorously and with a whiff of inevitability. “I started a contingency fee practice
at S&C about six years ago, when the actual
billing policy said, ‘We don’t do contingency
fees,’ ” says the 40-year-old Thomas. “So my
practice didn’t seem to really fit.”
Thomas’s new three-law-yer firm, Thomas, Alexander
& Forrester, based in a beach
house in Venice, California,
specializes in representing
businesses as plaintiffs in
commercial litigation. “My [former] partners
still think I’m out of my mind,” Thomas says.
But for someone who went from Carl Junction
to the top of The Am Law 100, Thomas is used
to the road less traveled.
7H7@ 4K ?; 3?; EF3@63D6E the Espirito
Santo case was rich in color, conflicts, and corruption. Espirito Santo bought into a factoring
business owned by two Argentine financiers.
(Factoring involves buying accounts receivable
for less than face value, eventually collecting,
and then pocketing the difference.) But the
Argentines had vastly inflated the value of their
holdings. A federal jury convicted them on
fraud charges in 2006. Left holding a reeking
investment, Espirito Santo went looking for
someone to blame and settled on BDO Seidman, claiming it failed to uncover the swindle.
Founded in Portugal in 1920 by the Espirito Santo family, Luxembourg-based
Espirito Santo Financial Group, S.A., has
operations in a dozen countries and nearly
$6 billion in revenue. In April 1998 its U.S.
subsidiary, Espirito Santo Bank of Florida,
went into business with Bankest Capital Corporation, an investment firm formed in 1986
by two wealthy Argentine brothers, Eduardo
and Hector Orlansky. Bankest owned a company called Bankest Receivables Factoring
Finance Company. “The bank was supplying money for [BRFFC], liked what it saw,
and wanted in on it,” says Bruce Lehr, name
partner at Miami’s Lehr Fischer & Feldman
and a lawyer for Hector Orlansky.
Espirito Santo and Bankest formed a new
factoring company called E.S. Bankest, LLC.
Eduardo and Hector became president and
vice president of the joint venture, respectively, with control of the board split between
representatives of Espirito Santo and Bankest Capital. In September 2002 the Orlanskys
bought out Espirito Santo’s interests for $10
million. But they failed to find new financing
to keep their company afloat—and couldn’t
make their payments to the bank.
Between 1998 and 2002, Espirito Santo
had sold $140 million in E.S. Bankest debenture notes to its clients, while making
another $30 million in loans to E.S. Bankest as part of a shareholder agreement. After the joint venture’s dissolution, Espirito
Santo bought back the debt rather than let
its customers take the hit.
In August 2003 Espirito Santo sued E.S.
Bankest in federal district court in Miami,
seeking to collect the $170 million. Judge
Paul Huck appointed Lewis Freeman, a principal at Coconut Grove,
Florida–based forensic accounting firm Lewis B.
Freeman & Partners, Inc.,
to act as monitor and then
receiver for E.S. Bankest.
Freeman uncovered a
very artful dodge. Nearly all
of E.S. Bankest’s factored accounts receivable
were fake. Under the guise of factoring, the
Orlanskys had essentially invested Espirito
Santo’s money in an assortment of umbrella
companies in hopes of cashing in when the
companies later went public—but most of
those investments turned out to be worthless.
Freeman says that out of the $224 million in
E.S. Bankest assets BDO certified as real in a
March 2003 audit, only about $5 million were
authentic. (BDO audited E.S. Bankest for the
duration of the partnership; it also audited
E.S. Bankest’s predecessor, BRFFC, in 1995
and 1996.) Federal prosecutors would later
ÇKI?D= 8:EÊI M?JD;II;IÊ
J;IJ?CEDO 7= 7?DIJ QJ>;
799EKDJ?D= <?HCS M7I
9H?J?97B JE EKH 97I;"È
I7OI 7B;N7D:;H$